Individual Fellow Initiatives

Displaying 1 - 4 of 4
Orange and Teal PTF Logo

Austin FC U: An Immersive Course Co-Development Between Austin FC and UT-Austin Sport Management

Cohort: 2022
Fellow: Matt Bowers

As the campus community enters a new post-pandemic era, it is clear that one of the most urgent needs
following 2+ years of remote and hybrid learning is to create poignant, relevant contexts for pursuing
immersive experiential learning. As universities reckon with the challenge of continuing to evolve their value
propositions to meet student demand for more industry-relevant experiences, there is an opportunity to
innovate how we design and deliver unique pedagogical experiences that connect more deeply with their

Logo of PTF acronym

Building Information Modeling (BIM) as a Proxy for Project-Based Learning Integration across the Architectural Engineering Undergraduate Curriculum

Cohort: 2019
Fellow: Fernanda Leite

The University of Texas at Austin’s Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering (CAEE) department has taken several steps towards improving the preparation of Architectural Engineering students with respect to modern engineering tools, including the computing tools commonly used in engineering practice.

Logo of PTF acronym

University of Texas Marketing Projects

Cohort: 2018
Fellow: Jade DeKinder

Marketing is inherently an applied science and, as a result, students learn the most when they can see marketing theories, constructs, and models in action. Marketing is at the intersection of so many academic disciplines—economics, statistics, psychology, sociology, organizational theory and decision science; and to see the way in which each of these disciplines influences marketing decisions requires the real-world dynamics of marketing-decision-making in a dynamic real-world context.

Logo of PTF acronym

Curriculum Integration Through a 4-year Design Project and Cross-course Educational Tools

Cohort: 2017
Fellow: Matthew Balhoff

In many curricula students find it difficult to understand the common thread and themes between their courses until near graduation (or ever). Thus, students are unable to benefit from the synergistic nature of a fully integrated program. Courses are taught by different instructors with different teaching styles and nomenclature (a potentially good thing), but all too often even the instructors are unaware of the material or educational objectives taught in complementary courses.